CNY_Dave
Members-
Posts
2032 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
5
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Store
Everything posted by CNY_Dave
-
I see a coupla things there... 1) I wonder why the ABS runs a signal in- no traction control on this critter... 2) I assume "Transfer Duty Solenoid" is aka the "Duty C" solenoid? 3) If I were to cut the ^%%^^ cruise control signal, will it stop being MORE prone to downshifting on hills with the cruise on? 4) If I take that same cruise control signal and run it to a switch (with the right voltage, aka gnd or +5 or +12) can I use it as a 'sport shift' signal? I realize 3,4 may induce some heartburn as the subie literature says the trans is supposed to be less sensitive to loading with the cruise on, but on mine, I can assure, attest, and prove that ain't the case! With the cruise on, it downshifts up hills that don't require a downshift, and if I kill the cruise I can maintain speed with no downshift, so I'd really like to keep the TCU from knowing the cruise is on. Dave
-
Sorry, no, that is wrong. When the body rolls Left/Right, the CG moves Left/Right, the further the CG moves the more the weight will transfer. Simple physics. If body roll didn't affact weight transfer, SUVs wouldn't roll over during accident avoidance maneuvers. When the car turns right, and the body rolls left on the suspension, the CG moves left as well. All weight transfer is not because of body roll, but the amount of body roll affects the weight transfer. I'm, not talking about how to limit the roll; but, if you lessen body roll, you limit the weight transfer. Or are you talking just about front/rear transfer? Dave
-
It wasn't necc. the case today, but being able to do 'the flick' if need be can be a life saver. Did some practice on the way home and I have a much better feel for it. Pretty sure if there was less body roll there'd be less oversteer. And also, of course, less body roll would cause less weight transfer. Dave
-
"C" is ineed part of it- had my truck so long, I could tell you very well exactly what it could or could not do, and how fast, and how far out the assend would slide, etc. The sube I've had only since October. Need more practice in the subie! I've gotten lotsa snow practice, not much dry-pavement slaloming yet. Dave
-
No VDC. And yeah, had I been a n00b, that would have been a spin into the ditch. Throttle was neutral, though (just enough to maintain speed, about 65mph). I know stiffer struts (firmer damping) would help a lot (that's why my ranger handled insanely well for a pickup, man could that thing carve an on-ramp), just wondering if this is subie-normal, or are my struts shot at 5 years/60Kmiles? Wonder if the 6cyl makes this better or worse? Dave
-
In general, handling isn't horrible. Quick lane-change today (think accident-avoidance maneuver) was a bit ugly. I mean, a lot worse than my old '92 ranger pickup. Dug in with a lot of roll on the primary turn, fishtailed pretty bad on the straighten-out portion, and she wagged a few times after that. Granted, I have Dunlop Graspic DS2s on there, not fabulous dry-road tires, but maybe the struts are gettin' weak? TP is up to spec, just had it aligned. I know its not a bloody porsche, but it did seem a bit worse than I'd expect. Dave
-
Dunno how cross-forum posts are tretaed here, but... http://subaruoutback.org/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=11678 I for one am treating his Q as a serious question (out of politeness), and I'll enter into discourse with him as long as he's civilized (3, 2, 1...). What do you guys think of the axle-length theory? Dave