
SubaruFred
-
Posts
153 -
Joined
-
Last visited
SubaruFred's Achievements

USMB is life! (4/11)
0
Reputation
-
I thought I read something about you looking at the monroe catalog and finding that the rear forester struts were actually shorter by a tiny bit than the 96-98 OB ones. That it was a different code for 90-91 vs 92-94 legacy, and that left a flatter stance on your 93 than if you had gone 96-98OB in the rear. Am i remembering that correct? I have a 1992 Legacy. I want a even lift (no rake) and I'll probably put some 205/70R15's on. I too need to maintain some gas mileage and can't go too heavy of a tire. So if you were in my position, knowing what you know, what would you do? Thanks
-
Thanks, glad you like it. My car had leaking air shocks so I bought used Forester struts *********emblies and also new replacement Forester struts because the used ones had 100,000 miles on them. The fronts were a direct fit but the rear Forester top hats were not. I had to slot the top hat mounting holes in the strut towers and use 1/4" spacers from Paranoid Fabrications. If I had it to do over again I would have bought rear top hats for a 93 Lego and used them instead. If you already have springs on your Lego, you can easily swap your rear top hats onto the Forester struts. I'm not sure if the springs are interchangeable. You can also use struts from a 96-98 Outback to get the same lift.
-
Hi, I know it's been a while since you posted but do you know what year the Forester struts were from? With the 93 Lego top hats would there be any mods needed to them to fit? I have a 94 Legacy LS that had the airs taken out and rides like a pregnant sow. I'ld like to get an inch or two lift and firmer ride.
Thanks,
Craig
-
-
I read that you lifted your 93 legacy on 2000 forester struts and got about a 2" lift? It looks great, I'm trying to do something similar. Did you just put the forester struts on or did you also use the 2000 forester springs?