jonathan909

Don't know this software or cable, but "offline test mode" suggests just that - that it's offline (i.e. not connecting/connected to the ECU) and is running in test mode based on some internally-generated or -stored data that (obviously) has no relation to the true system readings you're looking for. I have no idea why they'd include this or what it's meant to "test".

Kinda figgered it might be something like that.

E14 external Torx? Unless it's unusually skinny, not all that special - I've got a (Snap-on) set of those things. I think the excuse for buying them was a Grand Cherokee hatchback gas shock or something similarly stupid.

I see... it's a ring thing, and the (relevant) difference between the EJ and FB is that with the latter you can actually get at all the rod bolts through the block, so the rods come out with the pistons (rather than unpinning the pistons from the rods). This would seem to be a tractable problem for someone who's ever successfully torqued a rod cap in place. So is there some magic here that I'm missing?

Now I'm just curious: What's the difference between these FB blocks and the EJs that makes it such a can of worms? And what's the actual source of the problem? Rings?

We drive beaters - nothing less than 20 years old. Newest vehicle I own is an '08 Nissan Titan, and it's a POS. I hate new cars. So the reason I'm asking is that I just met a neighbor who has one of these nightmare oil-burning 2013s. I gather this really is a thing, complete with the class-action suit. Owing to circumstances, though, I don't think whatever relief might be available under the suit applies to him. So I'm asking as a wrench-puller: How do you fix it?

Sure, the >50K check will tell you at a glance whether it (or the cable) has suffered a catastrophic failure i.e. short, but that's about all. The problem is that it can also mean that the device/wiring has opened up, so it remains a pretty much meaningless test. Looking back at your original posting, though, I realize that it could have been read as "zero K" or "okay".

I don't have an answer to your question, but would like to point out that taking a resistance measurement of ("ohming out") the knock sensor will give you a meaningless reading. You cannot test it this way, because it's a piezoelectric transducer. It's like your BBQ lighter - a crystal that, when physically shocked, generates a voltage. You might as well check the temperature of your oven with a bathroom scale.

Simplest problem on earth - a scratchy pot. You're going to have to take it out and pop the lid, then spray some electronic contact cleaner/lubricant into that volume control. There's usually a little hole in it to spray into. Should sort you right out.

I haven't really done any stereo swapping (other than just trying to make sure each of my cars has a factory AM/FM/CD) and don't care about subs, so I can't help on that front - I don't even know what the P117 and P121 models are. But as far as the (Alpine) security system goes, you can just unplug that module and the keyless entry will still work (when you get a fob), as it's a separate module. So that will at least remove the security system misbehaving as a variable.

Sure - in that case (just to up the tongue weight) what you're trying to do isn't at all unreasonable.

Without actually looking at the numbers, my suspicion would be that that platform wouldn't have the vehicle weight, suspension, or power to support that extra load, making it unlikely that anyone would have built a hitch for it. What's your problem with the class 2? Just the receiver size, or the capacity? Because we've gone on many family (of four) trips with our '99 OBW with a full load of camping+sailing gear, and towing a boat (less than a 1000 lbs.), and there is no power to spare. It's fantasy to think that it'll work with ten times that towing load.

Then find that the ones who have it either won't ship north of the border, or will do so for two or three times the cost of the part. This is why I have a Montana mailbox.

1. Time. As in, we'd like to solve this problem today. 2. The price you see in USD does not necessarily approximate what we wind up paying, all in, when it's headed for Greater Soviet Canuckistan. The amazon link you provided doesn't even display a price. https://www.amazon.ca/Zhixiang-13021AA141-Crankshaft-Sprocket-2000-2015/dp/B091HX1TLZ/ref=sr_1_2?dchild=1&keywords=Subaru+13021AA141&qid=1629850460&sr=8-2 (In case my link won't show you the price, it's almost $100 for a Chinese knockoff.)

Thanks. Looking at the fit table on that first one, it appears that anything with a 2.5 that's '02 or later is a good bet. The earlier ones are mostly 2.2 .

Can someone save me the research, please? It would be very helpful to know when (200x) this changed from the a-few-flags to the many-teeth version. Reason I ask is that I'm helping out a pal with an '07 GT that's really busting his chops, we just discovered a missing tooth (don't bother asking why - it's complicated) and knowing which years to scout the junkyard for would save us time+hassle.

We already had that conversation, but noted again.

This may be turning out to be less mysterious than I thought. It's beginning to look like the two overheatings from the two bad rad hoses precipitated an HG leak that is now causing coolant loss and in turn the new overheating (insert frowny face here).

Honestly, the best advice I can offer - especially for a brother who needs to jam econo - is to find a good local indy tire shop and buy a good used matched set from them. Then stick with them. The guy we go with here in Calgary, I think we've been dealing with him for 30 years. Every ten years or so he moves his shop to try to get away from us, but we keep tracking him down. He's almost always able to take care of us; we've only had to look elsewhere (the local buy+sell - kijiji) for the old '95 Legacy wagon with the small wheels because those sizes are getting rare. Then we still take them to him for mounting+balancing.

There's wax in there?

A valid suggestion too. Mine was based on the assumption that, while the remote entry transmitter is active (that is, it needs a battery to work), the key transponder is passive, like an RFID tag. And while programming the car for the former (pairing) is usually a user operation, I would guess that programming the car for a transponder would have to be done by the dealer.

To reiterate: I don't know anything about transponder keys or if this car uses them. My comments are based on the assumption that it does. My guess is that you're confusing the key's transponder with the key's keyless entry transmitter. They are not the same thing. Just for yuks, take the battery out of the key that works. It won't (un)lock the doors, but does it still start the car?

I don't have anything this new, so I don't know whether this is a key transponder thing or similar. But what you're saying is confusing. You're saying you have three keys, two of them make the motor go vroom, and the third doesn't? So this is a key problem and not a car problem i.e. the car hasn't been programmed for the transponder in the nonworking key?

Thermostat: I'm not talking about opening temp, because by the time it's that hot it's either already fully-open or clamped shut (i.e. defective). I'm considering the possibility that there's an aftermarket cheapie in there that doesn't open as wide and support as high a flow rate as OEM. Gotta consider it.

Interesting. Aside from it sticking out kinda far, my gut reaction is that it would be a perfect product for PILE (Premature Inadvertent Lubricant Egress). But they claim to make them for a lot of engines, big and small, and if they were a disaster-in-waiting I expect they would have been run off the market by now.