kamesama980
Members-
Posts
74 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Store
Everything posted by kamesama980
-
3rd vote for just one. there are things to replace in sets so they wear symmetrically or because of the effort involved: you don't replace one ring on one piston. you shouldn't replace one tire in a 4wd and many full time AWD cars. Coils do wear out, the magnetic properties of the core change over time but the lifespan/degradation time of on ignition coil is so long and there's enough overhead before you'd notice that it's meaningless to the lifespan of the car as a whole. It's not even a consideration with the mean-time-before-failure calculation.
-
Burning oil can lead to high HC, that's what oil is. Burning oil will also poison the cat and o2 sensor. the HC reading could be from oil being leaked at the time of the test or built up in the exhaust. Couple tricks I've heard over the years: 1. pull a plug wire (and ground it so you don't get zapped or burn it up) so you have one cylinder dumping fuel into the exhaust. raise the RPM a tad (1-1.5k) to keep it running. The extra fuel will combust in the cat building up lots of heat. The extra heat may burn off some of the carbon buildup and return enough cat functionality to pass. Of course "enough" happens to be right next to "melted catalyst" and "get the fire extinguisher". 2. is slightly less interesting because it's just hop on the freeway for 10 minutes before you go get it checked without using overdrive (again to build up heat but in a more limited fashion) 3. run the tank near empty put a few gals of e85 in (just enough to run o bit, take the test, and get to the gas station. take test. fill with "normal" gas. 4. move out of whatever liberal, overpopulated, soul-killing craphole you live in. No guarantees with any of them and a few risks that I mentioned. OBD1 has only basic codes. That's one of the major advertised features of OBD2: more/better codes and somewhat more ability to know if it'll pass.
-
^this! Have installed hundreds of wheel bearings of this style in the shop and a few of my own and no problems. Besides there are enough idiots out there that the mfr wouldn't ship it in something that looks OK but isn't even if it were wrapped in warning labels. They'd be out of business from the lawsuits in about three seconds. That being said, the grease used is probably the bare minimum to get by without lawsuits and I see no fault with wanting something better. It does but it takes a fair bit of heat input in a short span to all of the components in the area to get them hot enough. I would expect to fail the seals and lose the grease or have foreign material intrusion before the grease failed completely.
-
Might want to read up on how gears work and the terminology used, I'm not entirely sure what you're asking. You will have more rpm at the same speed with a shorter (higher number) final drive. keep in mind the speeds and intended use, if you're near the top of a gear, you may have to shift to the next gear at the same speed which will be a 1 step forward, 2 steps back problem.
-
the 03 baja has a throttle cable (EJ251) later n/a models got the DBW EJ253. all turbos are DBW (EJ255?). That's why I got an 03 NA and not newer or turbo. as for fixing the sticking, make sure there isn't a crack in the housing and then use a dry lube. don't use graphite because it could migrate into the electronics.
-
I assume the tester replaces the radiator cap? It isn't a valid test because you're blocking the pressure release point and simply having the system be capable of generating that much pressure ins't valid for reasons mentioned above (thermal expansion of the coolant). I wouldn't get too hung up on the continued stream of bubbles without a gas analyzer. it's not uncommon for hot spots to boil or for the pump to cavitate, both of which are much easier without pressure in the system (Remember that the upper radiator hose temp is AVERAGE of all the coolant coming out of the engine. The part of the water jacket closest to the crank might be barely above the inlet temp while around the head it'll be MUCH higher. Lets say the outlet temp is 200f. there's a lot of water around the cylinders that's 180f and a little around the exhaust ports in the head and turbo water jacket at 250. That's why you need coolant to have additives and pressure to raise the boiling point to 280+ rather than just pure water boiling at 212 when the system average is 200. Now if you got a hold of a coolant exhaust gas tester and the bubbles tested positive as being exhaust gas, then yes I'd worry about a BHG. If you had the standard 16psi radiator cap and the overflow tank had bubbles blowing in it, then yes I'd suggest BHG.
-
You went to the dealership (the place that sells new cars) and asked if your old car was worth fixing (the logical alternative in their eyes being buying a new one from them) and they said you should buy a new one from them and you were surprised?! I can't say they make more money off it but they make it a lot easier, more consistently, and with happier tech's (and really, happier customers) working on new cars under warranty and periodic maintenance. Customers with old cars tend to be either short or stingy with money and like to nitpick suggested work and argue costs. People that are willing to let go of the cash for a new car usually have and are willing to part with more cash to maintain it. (generally) the real pain in the butt customers are like me, guys that have an auto tech degree, used to work in the shop, and have a garage outfitted like a shop in for warranty work, they try to sell all the other junk and get upset when I cut them off and tell them to do the (free) recall work and DON'T top off the fluids, DON'T set the tire pressure, DON'T try to sell me all the other garbage they make money off of. Lots of other good advice here, can't really add more except that your hubby knows more than he thinks. There are fewer differences between the brands and even comparing to an air-cooled bike engine than you'd guess.
-
Agreed that only the OP can decide. Rebuilding is not only dependent on a qualified mechanic but not cost effective for the mechanics most qualified. (What I mean is the Subaru specialty mechanic will charge most.) As far as an absolute and objective financial value, no you can't rebuild it for what it's worth (or maybe just barely) but that's not the whole point. My in-laws have '16/'17 Imprezza, forester, and outback and I had an Imprezza as a loaner while the dealership did the airbag recall. Quite frankly, F that. I've always been a bit of a Luddite when it comes to cars but I'll rebuild my Baja several times over faced with those as the alternative. It's not just how much you spend vs the car's blue book value, it's how much you spend vs what you'd spend on another car, tax, registration, and an extra thousand on hand for the first couple things that break that you won't know because you don't know the car's history. Automotively speaking, I'll take the devil I know 9 times out of 10.
-
could be something else but 99% chance it's just the synchros from dropping 5->4 a lot. My baja's the same way.
- 6 replies
-
- MT
- manual transmission
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Rear engine tranny: Now w/ Pics
kamesama980 replied to WoodsWagon's topic in Vanagon Conversion Discussion
More like fun for NOTHING. Autostick takes the bad from auto and manual transmissions and add it next to no parts availability for the fun of it. Toss that in the scrap bin and use a real manual trans. while not as cheap and common as they once were, they still are relatively so. -
Correct, the EU figures tow ratings with less tongue weight (greater total capacity, less stable) at lower speed (more stable). If you need a 1600lb trailer, what's going on it? Like Gary said, safety towing is a sliding scale, not absolutes. The biggest safety factor in towing is what's behind the steering wheel. I've towed well past the rating before but that was a very different vehicle ('90 toyota pickup manual trans with a bit of work done). I wouldn't overload my Baja nearly as much, and absolutely wouldn't overload with an automatic. If you're towing it once, within a few blocks with little traffic and no hills in 1st or 2nd gear....go for it. If you're going any distance with other people around, hills, or out of 1st-2nd gear, just rent a uhaul.
-
How do you think they write the Haynes/Chiltons manuals that run $15-20? They have the OE manual open and orate notes because the original's copyrighted. Same for Alldata and others. "they" pay a lot more and diffuse the price through numbers. That being said, there are better sources, legit and otherwise than giving your credit card info to a site called repairmanuals.co That just sounds kinda sketchy
-
That was my first thought as I've seen it happen. Age is far less relevant than care. 5 years old in a humid climate with no fluid changes can be a problem where frequent fluid changes and a dry climate can have little issue after decades. Next question: exactly what procedure are you using to pump the pedal? The proper way is to pump the pedal, hold it down, then open the bleeder for just a moment (to keep from bottoming the MC), close it, repeat.
-
No, you just screwed your system. Just venting the system is not an empty system, it's a system full of air and humidity. Air (N2 and O2 mainly) in the AC system is a contaminant and detracts from the refrigerant capacity reducing efficiency. Moisture in the system reacts with the refrigerant and lubricant to create some nasty acids that eat the system from the inside out. i bought the cheap gauge and 12once can of coolant was about $40 at nappa, i change all the green O-Rings first also bought at nappa. i made sure the A/C system was empty. it was because it was empty. i Filled with one 12once can the gauge read about 35 i think , i have a arctic 43dagrees for a month now. PS make sure you buy the fill hose with the gauge they are a little more but u can see what is going on. If you want a worthwhile gauge, get a manifold gauge set, 3 hoses, 2 gauges. As for replace/recharge the filter dryer, while it might be possible to recharge the dessicant, it also acts as a filter for the system. it's uncommon but any metal shavings, dust, or other contaminants get caught in there. They're usually pretty cheap ($20-40) so it's cheap insurance. Obviously, con't uncap and install it until you're ready to vacuum down the system or you'll be letting it absorb moisture before you even start. If you want the system to last more than a season, you need to vacuum it down. Whether you buy or rent is up to you and how often you think you'll need it. Side note, not recovering and storing/recycling R134 is illegal. not that most automotive boards care about things like laws.
-
yea, the rom-raider tunable ECMs are for, it sounds like, the throttle-by-wire (nasty things anyway lol). ECM tuning without other mods won't make a huge difference unless the stock tune is bad for some reason. Yes, the biggest thing would be a set of RV cams or a custom cut (no I don't know where) or a smallish supercharger ($$, tuning, fab, etc). long-tube tri-Y header and not-too-big exhaust might help some but generally, exhaust doesn't net you much down low because it's already sized to (barely) flow enough up high. I saw an Eaton M90 supercharger build on RS25.com that's pretty much my goal. Big fat bottom end torque for towing and auto-x.
-
IIRC the 251 was only used in 03s like mine. 04+ used the throttle-by-wire version. I'm in the same boat (heads weeping oil) and everything I've read is that for the trouble and bending-over-backwardsness of doing the heads in-car, it's easier to pull the engine and do it right. It certainly LOOKS easy to pull the engine and that's what I plan on doing this summer.
-
Unfortunately there's limited gains to NA hp in the "usable" range. I'm in the same mindset about usable vs peak power. you can get a better low-mid rpm torque cam but it won't improve the number of HP, just bolster the midrange a little. Since you're limited to ~100% VE (think of it as limiting how much torque you can gain) with an NA, the biggest hp gains come from increasing the revs. the same torque at higher rpm = more power. so a 200+hp 2 or 2.5l doesn't make any more power in the daily driver rev-range, it makes it at 8k rpm, usually sacrificing low end. Think motorbikes: huge hp out of 1l: it idles at 1500 rpm and has to rev to 15k to do it and only makes 1/3 that number of ftlbs (similar ftlbs to the same motor with a low-rpm cam). My BMW is a great example: They took the 1150 motor, punched it out to 1200 and slapped smaller valves and cams, long intake runners, and a different tune to go from 100hp @ 8k to 63hp @ 6k while the torque stayed the same 70ish ftlbs but the peak moved from 6k to 3k. My bike tops out at 105mph from the factory but pulls like a turbodiesel at more moderate speeds. That isn't saying there aren't gains to be had but don't expect much peak number gain, especially for the money, without raising the redline. As others have said though, unless you're making a fair bit of power over stock, you'll be fine.