-
Posts
10137 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
105
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Store
Everything posted by 1 Lucky Texan
-
from wiki; ****** Major shareholders Nissan had acquired a 20% stake in 1968 during a period of government-ordered merging of the Japanese auto industry in order to improve competitiveness under the administration of Prime Minister Eisaku Sato. Nissan would utilize FHI's bus manufacturing capability and expertise for their Nissan Diesel line of buses. In turn, many Subaru vehicles, even today, use parts from the Nissan manufacturing keiretsu. The Subaru automatic transmission, known as the 4EAT, is also used in the first generation Nissan Pathfinder. Speculation has suggested that it was Subaru that introduced Renault to Nissan, when Renault asked for assistance in all-wheel drive (AWD) technology, and when FHI told Renault to discuss their plans with Nissan, the discussions may have been a contributing factor to the currently successful Renault-Nissan alliance. Upon Nissan's acquisition by Renault, its 20% stake was sold to General Motors. On October 5, 2005 Toyota Motor Corporation purchased 8.7% of FHI shares from General Motors who had owned 20.1% of FHI[5] since 1999. GM later divested its remaining 11.4% stake, selling its shares on the open market to sever all ties with FHI. FHI previously stated that there might have been 27 million shares (3.4%) acquired before the start of trading by an unknown party on October 6, 2005, and speculation suggested that a bank or perhaps another automaker was involved. After the purchase, Toyota announced a contract with Subaru on March 13, 2006 to use the underutilized Subaru manufacturing facility in Lafayette, Indiana, and Toyota announced plans to hire up to 1,000 workers and set aside an assembly line for the Camry model, beginning in the second quarter of 2007. During the brief General Motors period, a "badge engineered" Impreza was sold in the United States as the Saab 9-2X. An SUV (Subaru Tribeca / SAAB 9-6X) was also planned[6][7] but the SAAB version did not proceed.[8] ****** I've heard rumors that some soobs got GM alternators. maybe someone will know more about that. I don't think there was much design input if any actually.
-
I am by no means convinced of anything. Just trying to create some troubleshooting approaches to eliminate things. Clunking noises and some of your other symptoms can be cause by that Shudderless Freering joint/tripod joint w'ever they call it. Heck, just getting the front end up, grabbing the tire, first one side then the other, and rotating them frwrd./rev.-frwrd/rev, while looking at and listening to the axle joints MIGHT demonstrate some problem. Did you wipe off that seepage on the diff? You should monitor that. Even a drop or 2 from there on the exhaust would stink. HEY, get a couple of drops off the diff's dipstick, drip them on something really hot (your exhaust or heat up a big washer or bolt w'ever) and see if it triggers a memory of the smell you first reported.
-
Tokico makes some sport struts for Imprezas. But if you just want to stay near-stock, KYB probably a better choice than Monroe, Gabriel, w'ever. I just put some on my wife's Outback - no problems. Keep in mind, ANY new struts could feel 'stiff'/'different' than your present 'blown' ones. MWE (through ccrengines.com IIRC) sells rebuilt Soob axles. Lots of folks do complain about aftermarket axles. So far, I have no issues with the EMPI unit in my wife's car. Raxles.com supposedly has a good reputation too. Supposedly, the rebuilts from the Subaru dealer are top quality but, unless they, or any, local place will guranteed to take back any that clunk, leak or vibrate, it's a risk. Also, do not put the wheel on the ground for the final torque on the axle nut. Supposedly not good for the bearing (wonder if this could lead to the vibration complainst people sometimes report on replacement axles?). Slip a giant screwdriver or something in the brake rotor vents, back up against the caliper, then torque. You can find DIY stuff on the Forums for axles and struts and for rebuilding your own axles. Rebuilding looks messy - but def. would be the cheapest, most ideal way to get good axles back on your car. and rockauto and amazon have been great resources for parts.
-
I can't argue with your experience (and the point about torque is good, especially for towing), and I'm not a diesel hater (I'd definitely get a diesel pick-up if I towed regularly), but I think plenty of people experience engine longevity and many of the other things you mention with gas. Might not have spark plugs(which can last over 60K now - maybe 100K miles), but there are glowplugs right?(maybe not anymore - dunno) Plus the better availability of gas, perhaps less engine noise. There's room for both on the road - as with hybrids (diesel hybrid would be brilliant!) and electric. Dunno if you pay higher sticker price or not for comparable gas engine - but fuel savings should not be the primary consideration as it seems minimal. When I was younger, diesel was the cheapest fuel at the station, Now, it's often the most expensive.
-
I wouldn't think open loop would LEAD to rough-running so(maybe poor gas mileage), perhaps there is a different....or second problem. But that is weird about the sensor. Are you the original owner? Cause, a different problem someone else had was traced to a bundle of poorly repaired wires at the ECU.
-
If I was FORCED to dream up an excuse to choose one of those filters over the other, the thinking would go like this; suppose the previous owner ran 'dino oil' (conventional) and you say you will run synthetic; synthetic is very good at keeping 'varnish' in solution. That's why it always look darker/dirtier. So, your first fill with synthetic 'may' be cleaning out xtra varnish left by the previous oil. Could that increase the likelihood of the filter's media being clogged more than normal? If so, then the filter with the lower bypass valve opening pressure 'might' be preferred and I suppose that would be the OEM filter. but I doubt there's a practical difference - and you could probably return the PureOne for store credit if you never plan to use it.
-
WAIT! - do you still have the box? Or, on the receipt is there a part number? The reason I ask is, turns out the Stant that I was sent by RockAuto 'may' be the only t'stat that might be OK in subarus. Just discovered that recently. http://www.ultimatesubaru.org/forum/showthread.php?t=128919&highlight=stant
-
because it has no (or very low) compression (due to broken, skipped timing belt and.or bent valves), the load on the starter is greatly reduced and it spins faster. Amother quick test that would point to a busted or severely slipped TB; tear off a strip of paper, hold it at the tailpipe while someone cranks the engine several times. If the paper tries to 'suck in' in addition to being blown away, you have valve timing problems.