rikblok Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 Hi Subie experts, it's time for me to get some new all seasons for my '98 Legacy L. For some reason when I bought her (used) she came with 195/75R14 but I understand she should have 185/70R14. I'm thinking of going down to the proper size (to improve the speedometer accuracy). I can re-use the same (steel) rims, right? Is there any reason I should stick with the larger size? Also, I'd appreciate your recommendations on good rain tires. Based on Tire Rack's ratings I'm leaning towards the Michelin HydroEdge for their wet performance. Does anybody have experience with this tire? Are there any other rain tires you'd recommend? Thanks for your help, Rik Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fairtax4me Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 Your cars recommended tire size should be listed on the loading information sticker in the drivers door jamb. Not a huge difference between a 195/70 and a 185/75. The 195 is a centimeter wider, and mathematically, a few mm shorter though there is little noticeable difference visually. The speedometer is hardly affected by such a small change in circumference, which can be seen as a percentage thanks to this site: http://www.miata.net/garage/tirecalc.html The 195 will hold the road slightly better (wider footprint). TireRacks ratings have to be taken with a grain of salt. Those are consumer submitted ratings, and are often based on the consumers experience with previous tires. Frinstance: Kumho tires. I had a set on a car several years ago, two of them blew out on me for no apparent reason while driving on the interstate. (separate occasions) Tires fault? Maybe, maybe not, doesn't matter, I've never bought another set since. I know dozens of other people who run Kumho's on their DDs, and see the brand on many, many other vehicles on the road from passenger cars, to 1 Ton pickups to tractor trailers. Yet I still don't/won't buy them due to MY previous experience with that particular brand of tires. Make sense? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjou812 Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 I'm considering Hankook Optimo H727. Consumer Reports rated them #2 behind the Hydroedge, but they rated the H727 better on snow and ice at the sacrifice of some tread life. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rooster2 Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 IMO, I would buy the 195 vs 185 size tire. For a couple of bucks more per tire, they handle better, ride better, with negligible spedo difference. I have had good performance with Kuhmo Solice 721 tire. Sell for a reasonable price too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sparky11 Posted January 7, 2010 Share Posted January 7, 2010 I UPGRADED my 97 Brighton wagon to 15" Forester wheels that I got used, with 195 / 60 - 15 tires and the difference in handling was significantly better and no change in ride comfort. Put good snow tires on the 14's. Gives you a good and cheap winter/summer set. 60's aren't that great in the snow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rikblok Posted January 13, 2010 Author Share Posted January 13, 2010 Thanks guys, I'm going to go ahead with 195/70R14s on my current rims. (I've already got another set of winter rims.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rooster2 Posted January 14, 2010 Share Posted January 14, 2010 Thanks guys, I'm going to go ahead with 195/70R14s on my current rims. (I've already got another set of winter rims.) Please report back on what you bought, what size, and how happy you are with the performance of the new tires. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.