kcpizzle95 Posted February 3, 2010 Share Posted February 3, 2010 i have a 95 legacy with a bad head gasket. i thought it would a cool project to put my96-99 2.5 heads on it. has anyone put phase 2 ej25 heads on a phase 1 ej22 block. i know the intake manifold is different, but is there any other issues like exhaust, OBD-1/2 issues(like CPS) to worry about. should i even expect to see power gains without rebuilding anything in the block. positive or negative, please post useful information only. thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gloyale Posted February 4, 2010 Share Posted February 4, 2010 Well firsst off 96-99 2.5 is still a Phase I motor. (Thrust bearing on #3 main, DOHC) Hmm......not sure what you will gain from that. Perhaps a bit more flow and HP on the very top end.....but my gut feeling is that you will not really notice anything signifigant and you may lose torque. The more common hybrid is to do the opposite. 2.5 block (phase I or II) with you're original 2.2 heads and intake. this combo bumps the compression slightly, along with more displacement, and retains all the cars original sensors, ECU, wiring. Others know more, may chime in. Check out NASIOC as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Battlewagon Posted February 4, 2010 Share Posted February 4, 2010 People have done this... to EJ22t engines to get more top end power. I haven't seen anyone do the swap on NA EJ22s. If you did it, you'd have to run a EJ25d ECU (or a piggyback or standalone) because your EJ22 ECU would get confused and you'd honestly not gain much power and you'd probably hurt your reliability. Yeah, and phase I heads are DOHC and phase II are SOHC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gloyale Posted February 4, 2010 Share Posted February 4, 2010 If you did it, you'd have to run a EJ25d ECU (or a piggyback or standalone) because your EJ22 ECU would get confused and you'd honestly not gain much power and you'd probably hurt your reliability. I don't think ECU management would be an issue. The displacement of the motor would still be the same. Cam Sprocket may need swapped, but otherwise I am sure the 2.2 ECU could run the engine fine. Only thing that would change is the heads. Still vote no for the idea......but the ECU wouldn't be any issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kcpizzle95 Posted February 6, 2010 Author Share Posted February 6, 2010 thanks guys, this info helps. if i dont attempt to put the 2.5 heads on, does anyone know of after market cams for a sohc, i can't seem to locate any. and/or is it worth porting the heads and intake mani. i know this isnt the best car to try and get massive HP gains but its a daily driver and i wouldnt mind at more power if i'm already going to do the work Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WoodsWagon Posted February 6, 2010 Share Posted February 6, 2010 Honestly, if you're pulling the motor out to do headgaskets, get a 2.5l that needs headgaskets. Do the headgasket job, drop it in instead of the 2.2 and you'll get a 30hp boost right there. DOHC heads on a 2.2 will DROP the compression ratio... good for more boost if you're running a turbo, not good if you're not. So, if you're putting a homebuilt turbo setup on it, it's a good thing. If you're not, don't. Putting 2.2l SOHC heads on a 2.5l block will raise the compression, to the point that you need to run premium all the time. But, it does pull way harder on the bottom end, which is where most motors spend their time. Your butt-dyno will be very pleased with this combo. There are lots of 2.5l engines out there with blown headgaskets. I got my last shortblock for $20. The guy I bought it off of wanted to keep the heads so he could send them out to be machined. That way, the next blown 2.5 he gets he has a set of heads ready to go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now