Jump to content
Ultimate Subaru Message Board

CVT reliability and OEM replacement reliability/warranty?


Recommended Posts

We saw lots of failures at the dealership where I worked, BUT, most of the ones I saw are ones that had not had any fluid changes....and still a relatively small percentage of the cars we saw.

 

They bumped the warranty on the early ones to 100k miles.

IIRC, replacement new ones have a 1 year warranty, and reman 3 year. Labor if they installed it, parts only if not.

 

 

 

Personally, I wouldn't avoid it for reliability reasons, just make sure it's had fluid changes (preferably with OE fluid, although GD has posted a good alternative, Amsoil I think). 

Edited by Numbchux
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Numbchux said:

Personally, I wouldn't avoid it for reliability reasons, just make sure it's had fluid changes (preferably with OE fluid, although GD has posted a good alternative, Amsoil I think). 

Thanks - more and more friends/family/acquaintances/colleagues are asking questions about them. 

Subaru dealer has one for sale they installed a used transmission into (i didn't know they did that), craptastic 1 month warranty and so far they haven't said what the mileage was. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, mikec03 said:

What was the typical mileage at failure.

 

80k+ typically. They came out of the woodwork when the warranty was extended to 100k for awhile

 

2 hours ago, idosubaru said:

Thanks - more and more friends/family/acquaintances/colleagues are asking questions about them. 

Subaru dealer has one for sale they installed a used transmission into (i didn't know they did that), craptastic 1 month warranty and so far they haven't said what the mileage was. 

 

Yea, we did plenty of used ones if the car was out of warranty (or before the extension). Junk yard ones were plentiful and cheap, which tells me they do not fail very often (more good transmissions in the junkyards than people looking for them). The remans are like $6k, and a low mileage junk yard one is like $6-800....no brainer.

 

We needed a CVT for a Nissan of some sort at one point, and I spent some serious time calling around to find one at all, and when I did they wanted like $4k, for a junkyard transmission with basically no warranty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This term, CVT, had me scratching my head so I searched:

Now that I've seen it I can't help but think of old machinery vari-speed drives married with silent chain instead of a wide rubber v-belt. Twisting & bending torque on that CVT belt must mean its a wear service item along with those pulleys. Vari-speed has been around for decades.  How do I know of variable speed drives - production metal turning & milling machines.

http://www.lovejoy-inc.com/products/variable-speed-drives.aspx

You'd think they could've put that internal filter element in a more convenient spot........

Edited by czny
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There were older models with CVT too - but I think it required modern fluids and sophisticated electronics to be able to transfer 'significant' power in a unit small and light enough, and with decent reliability, for a motor vehicle.

I think the first Justy's were CVT. Using the van Doorne trans? those had less force on them than modern cars I suppose.

CVTt has a fairly long history. Benz may have had a European patent in 1886, got a US patent in 1935. Some early motorcycles had stepless trans. Volvo had them , Audi, etc. There may also be systems that use variable volume hydraulic pumps and 'nutating cones' , toroidal systems, planetary gears??? etc. I guess they all have their own set of issues.....

Edited by 1 Lucky Texan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

So I've been interested in purchasing an Outback only to find out that the auto transmission only comes in the goofy "rubberbanding" CVT. Now I'm reading that they are failing (https://www.forbes.com/sites/jensen/2017/07/07/facing-complaints-subaru-offers-extended-warranties-on-1-5-million-vehicles/#4145b6bf79dc). This makes me want one much less to the point where I won't be buying one. Is the 5EAT transmission compatible with the 15 and up Outback? I've looked at pictures of the CVT and the 5EAT bolt pattern and they look similar but I don't know much about it. Obviously if there is another non CVT Auto transmission that is compatible I'd like to  hear about that as well.

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No 

If a small risk of cheap, straight forward trans replacement has you balking you’d never survive an auto swap on a modern Subaru. 

It would bolt up but swapping the harness would be a nightmare and playing nice with the CANBUS and FB would be all but impossible. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, idosubaru said:

No 

If a small risk of cheap, straight forward trans replacement has you balking you’d never survive an auto swap on a modern Subaru. 

It would bolt up but swapping the harness would be a nightmare and playing nice with the CANBUS and FB would be all but impossible. 

This is exactly what I was thinking. They stopped putting a conventional auto in the Outback almost 10 years ago.

You're far more likely to have an oil consumption issue on the FB engine than a CVT failure. Both happen enough that they extended the warranty, but still a relatively low percentage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Numbchux said:

This is exactly what I was thinking. They stopped putting a conventional auto in the Outback almost 10 years ago.

You're far more likely to have an oil consumption issue on the FB engine than a CVT failure. Both happen enough that they extended the warranty, but still a relatively low percentage.

That's the thing - I haven't seen any FB or CVT issues personally yet.  Acquaintances, friends, and family driving these things who typically come to me with questions are cruising along without issues.  

Also Subaru's growth over that same time period is going to result in increased *numbers* of vehicles with issues even if the *rate* stays absolutely flat.  If the CVT has the same amount of failures as the older EAT trans, you'd see the same rate of failures but 3 times as many in quantity due to sales increases from like 180,000 to almost 700,000 in those 10 years. It wouldn't be hard for anecdotal people...which comprises most of this country...to make incorrect assessments from something that isn't noteworthy. 

There are FB and CVT issues but let the data speak not emotions, anecdotes, and opinions...

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, 1 Lucky Texan said:

how much does a used CVT from car-part.com cost? The demand for replacements might say a lot about failure rates.

 

On 9/25/2018 at 3:50 PM, Numbchux said:

we did plenty of used ones if the car was out of warranty (or before the extension). Junk yard ones were plentiful and cheap, which tells me they do not fail very often (more good transmissions in the junkyards than people looking for them). The remans are like $6k, and a low mileage junk yard one is like $6-800....no brainer.

So far they seem readily available and not expensive so demand isn't vastly outstripping supply. 

I feel like they're a little higher than 10 year old 4EAT's were 10 years ago but maybe that's just inflation

GD cautioned extended warranties may have kept prices low. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, 1 Lucky Texan said:

how much does a used CVT from car-part.com cost? The demand for replacements might say a lot about failure rates.

 

Take a look in your area...

 

When I was at the dealership, we bought several good used ones for around $500. We had several that had out-of-warranty torque converter failure, and it was cheaper to get a used trans than a new converter.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...