Myxalplyx Posted January 15, 2005 Share Posted January 15, 2005 Will, Are you experiencing clutch slippage between 4300rpm and 4900rpm at 12psi and above? Also, get with me in PM if you can. I need advice on the dyno file conversion to display horsepower and torque at the same time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowman Posted January 15, 2005 Share Posted January 15, 2005 Will, you are an inspiration to us all! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WJM Posted January 15, 2005 Author Share Posted January 15, 2005 Will, Are you experiencing clutch slippage between 4300rpm and 4900rpm at 12psi and above? Also, get with me in PM if you can. I need advice on the dyno file conversion to display horsepower and torque at the same time. NO clutch slip after I got the Kevelar one broken in. On the stock clutch the places it wold slip at 12 was at the TQ mountain there. lol above 3500 it didnt slip unless I ran more than 14...but it slipped down low cold on stock boost...and when warm, it would only hold 12 down low. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorganM Posted January 15, 2005 Share Posted January 15, 2005 Congrats on those good pulls man. Good results for some basic upgrades. Look forward to printouts after more upgrades.... we all know you arent done yet! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subarutex Posted January 15, 2005 Share Posted January 15, 2005 Real numbers are amazing. Will, much props to you. Now to get my arse in gear and fix mine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. RX Posted January 15, 2005 Share Posted January 15, 2005 It sure gets spikey at the higher boost, I wonder why. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Do It Sidewayz Posted January 15, 2005 Share Posted January 15, 2005 the spikeyness is prolly due to fueling.... i'm sure it needs more fuel up that high. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marck Posted January 16, 2005 Share Posted January 16, 2005 This is amazing, and no one believed. Can the header with an increase in boost make that much power? because an intercooler is not going to help on a dyno. I guess that says something about how crappy Subaru designed our stock crossover pipes. Are your cams stock? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DerFahrer Posted January 16, 2005 Share Posted January 16, 2005 That makes me wanna do my own EA82T build THAT much more!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WJM Posted January 16, 2005 Author Share Posted January 16, 2005 This is amazing, and no one believed. Can the header with an increase in boost make that much power? because an intercooler is not going to help on a dyno. I guess that says something about how crappy Subaru designed our stock crossover pipes. Are your cams stock? Top Speed didnt have thier IC fan up and going yet...JWX and I went to go find one like we had at the nasioc dyno day last year...and no dice. So we got ICE! We iced the IC down...it was nowhere NEAR as cool as it would be on the 'street' with the scoop directing the tons of air into it...but it kept it cooler than those other WRX's that went...their IC's got pretty warm... so the IC was somewhat cool. And at this point I need to make a correction...that first run there is in 4th gear....everyone was pulling 3rd....so we did the other recorded runs in 3rd. So..ignoring the first run...you can see that there is a tremendous gain over the stock stuff with the header/DP and IC. Its stock boost still. The recorded runs goes as follows: 1=4th gear, stock boost (stable at 6.5 PSI) 2=3rd gear, same as above 3=3rd, 10 PSI stable 4=3rd, 11.5~12 PSI 5=3rd, 14~15 PSI I should also note that when i dyno'd the wagon last year, we did 2 runs in 4th...that yeilded the 99 WHP figs...whats strange is the last two in THIRD gear yeilded 10 LESS WHP... where as here it looks to be the opposite. HOWEVER...the STi's are getting ~260 AWHP/TQ...in either 3rd or 4th....and WRX's are getting ~158-163 AWHP in either gear. Yes, it needs more fuel, and NO fuel cut gremlin!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JWX Posted January 16, 2005 Share Posted January 16, 2005 Yes, it needs more fuel, and NO fuel cut gremlin!! indeed, you should throw that "fuel system" you had in the wagon on it. and dyno it again Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WJM Posted January 16, 2005 Author Share Posted January 16, 2005 indeed, you should throw that "fuel system" you had in the wagon on it. and dyno it again Its useless really. It wont fix the gremlin. Plus the injectors are the bottle neck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PoorManzImpreza Posted January 16, 2005 Share Posted January 16, 2005 So..this is telling me I really need to hunt down that ea82T that was missing from my GL-10 parts car.... Man oh man stock wrx power from an ea82T... ahh...*continues to dream..* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WJM Posted January 16, 2005 Author Share Posted January 16, 2005 hahah...i have the ultimate Poor Man's WRX but with more TQ... total investment is less than 3k at this point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JWX Posted January 16, 2005 Share Posted January 16, 2005 ya but it would still be interesting to see what kind of difference it would make and you should get some super sweet megasquirt&EDIS on there soon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spanky_pete Posted January 16, 2005 Share Posted January 16, 2005 stock VF7 turbo, STOCK fuel system. and thats 161 AT THE WHEELS...thats about 230 at the crank. The timing is at stock levels too. I ran on some no name/nobrand 93 pump gas. I'll get the other charts up and smoothed soon. Dude that's pretty awesome, that's as good as a stock WRX makes. I'm looking forward to hearing how the TD04 performs. You've more than encouraged me to build my new wagon to beat my WRX. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tizzle Posted January 16, 2005 Share Posted January 16, 2005 Dangitt! where's my TWE parts? This is very cool. Good to see such nice numbers, Will Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WJM Posted January 16, 2005 Author Share Posted January 16, 2005 Thanks guys! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garner Posted January 16, 2005 Share Posted January 16, 2005 Nice!! Real numbers!! Hats off to you!! Is that about what you expected? I just found out the only Dyno in town is out of commission. I have to go nearly 100 miles to get to a dyno, one of these days.... good work garner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WJM Posted January 16, 2005 Author Share Posted January 16, 2005 Nice!! Real numbers!! Hats off to you!! Is that about what you expected? I just found out the only Dyno in town is out of commission. I have to go nearly 100 miles to get to a dyno, one of these days.... good work garner The dyno I went to is 300 miles away. And Im there almost every weekend anyhow. *more * I expected at a MINIMUM 130/140 at the wheels. So I am EXTREAMELY happy with 161/206 at the wheels. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subi81 Posted January 16, 2005 Share Posted January 16, 2005 Congrats!!! Awsome info!!! Giving me the itch to get on a dyno. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Myxalplyx Posted January 16, 2005 Share Posted January 16, 2005 So, is anyone going to put up the hp/torque challenge to Will? <------Looks around the room? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JWX Posted January 16, 2005 Share Posted January 16, 2005 I will, but give me a year or so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattyg41383 Posted January 17, 2005 Share Posted January 17, 2005 Well, Im gonna put in my entry to the contest in May as soon as the track opens up. My best time last year was a 14.91sec @ 93 mph... and i screwed up the start on that run... those numbers put the car around 144HP at the wheels. Im sure I can knock a couple tenths off that. And I've only dropped about $200 (two hundred ) dollars for the entire project. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Myxalplyx Posted January 17, 2005 Share Posted January 17, 2005 Ah great! A little competition never hurt nobody. You guys can't let Will get away with this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.