WJM Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 So JWX's RX was on the dyno this last sat. the two 84 hp runs were at stock boost...bottomless intake airbox, and bone stock everything else. The 100 hp runs were at 13 psi MBC. The ONLY difference between this time and the last time this car was on a dyno is the muffler. It had a glass pack on it then....for these runs it had a OE replacement muffler...an ACTUAL muffer. It put out 88 hp at the wheels on a mustang the last time...so I can see the 4hp loss. http://consumer.inkfrog.com/pix/WJM/jwxrxdyno.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iluvdrt Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 Is this a different rx, I thought you had 164 hp at the wheels? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushbasher Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 reread the first line in his post Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JWX Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 here let me help you with that So JWX's RX was on the dyno this last sat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WJM Posted February 28, 2005 Author Share Posted February 28, 2005 Exactly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorganM Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 Good MAX Torque for just turning up the boost. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JWX Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 ya but I wouldn't do that for long with out an IC, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oddcomp Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 ya but I wouldn't do that for long with out an IC, y not? where is your sense of adventure? its only 3 psi more than i ran all the time with no ic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JWX Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 cause I really think even stock they need an IC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oddcomp Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 your missing my useless point here ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Do It Sidewayz Posted February 28, 2005 Share Posted February 28, 2005 again.....that dyno curve is SOOO choppy....it just reinforces the fact that these things need proper engine management Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WJM Posted March 1, 2005 Author Share Posted March 1, 2005 I know I know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iluvdrt Posted March 1, 2005 Share Posted March 1, 2005 reread the first line in his post Reading>me. My bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JWX Posted March 1, 2005 Share Posted March 1, 2005 again.....that dyno curve is SOOO choppy....it just reinforces the fact that these things need proper engine management those were my thoughts, so I decided my next big engine mod will be MS&EDIS. and I'm prolly going to tune it myself so I've got some reading to do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oddcomp Posted March 1, 2005 Share Posted March 1, 2005 yay Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Myxalplyx Posted March 20, 2005 Share Posted March 20, 2005 Me was looking for dyno posts and saw this today. As far as the choppy lines go, get yourself a RRFPR and raise the pressure. If choppiness is due to lean air/fuel ratio, it'll be less choppy with higher fuel pressure. Also, get your fuel injectors cleaned. I need to get on the ball with this but I am busy tooling around like a fool with one of the XT6s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now