hush777 Posted March 18, 2005 Share Posted March 18, 2005 Putting a carbed short block in with turbo heads to basically run a car with mpfi. Car was turbo but the short block is shot and I don't have any extra stuff except the carbed block. So my question is which set of cams would be closest to the cams from a true mpfi engine. Carbed? SPFI? or TURBO? I can do any one of these (extra sets of cams around), so whats your opinion? Thanks Hush Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MilesFox Posted March 18, 2005 Share Posted March 18, 2005 i would use the spfi or carb cams, as they have valve overlap for scavenging. wheras a turbo cam has little overlap otherwise boost would blow out the exhaust if you used turbo cams for n/a it would lug great pulling trailers at 2000 rpm but would be a dog at higher rpm. it would be ideal for an open header(no y pipe) for lower rpm power carb and spfi would have different rpm curves. right now i am running spfi cams and heads with a carb motor i would say get some numbers betwen carb and spfi cams. i think one is a 4500 rpm cam and one is a 5500 rpm cam, but dont know which is which kep in mind a carb motor has less compression than spfi, so i wonder if that would factor into the cam duration? spfi has 9.5 compression same as n/a mpfi just my suggestions but the turbo cam in a carb motor i know about from my own experimenting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
85Sub4WD Posted March 18, 2005 Share Posted March 18, 2005 Putting a carbed short block in with turbo heads to basically run a car with mpfi.Car was turbo but the short block is shot and I don't have any extra stuff except the carbed block. So my question is which set of cams would be closest to the cams from a true mpfi engine. Carbed? SPFI? or TURBO? I can do any one of these (extra sets of cams around), so whats your opinion? I would use carbed cams - lower peak torque and HP I would also go with N/A MPFI - found on many 1985 cars that were non-carb (no SPFI in 1985) and all non-turbo XT4's - more power than SPFI - and if it is an 1987/later XT4, it has the later gen MPFI, which is a lot like SPFI However, SPFI is much easier to find parts for, so you might be just as well off with an SPFI setup. I currently have a carb block and heads, with SPFI intake & exhaust manifolds - very good combination, makes the car run well your compression ratio is 9:1 if it is a carbed block - so I would use a SPFI or N/A MPFI block for a higher ratio (actually all you need is the pistons - they adjust CR for these cars) - higher CR ratio = more power Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calebz Posted March 18, 2005 Share Posted March 18, 2005 if it is an 1987/later XT4, it has the later gen MPFI, which is a lot like SPFI Elucidate please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
85Sub4WD Posted March 18, 2005 Share Posted March 18, 2005 if it is an 1987/later XT4, it has the later gen MPFI, which is a lot like SPFI Elucidate please. Sorry - that was stupidly vague - what I meant was that it uses a similar engine control system - hot wire MAF (though I think it is different than the SPFI system) and the CAS is the same - so at least a part is interchangeable - also your timing advance is controlled by the computer (like with SPFI), so you get better performance (the advances - mechanical and vacuum used to get stuck all the time on my distibuitor) Basically, if you go MPFI N/A, go with a later version. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now