subynut Posted August 25, 2005 Share Posted August 25, 2005 Yup, all that torque out of the engine is great, but if you can't get it through the clutch, what good is it? I've got the 9.5 pistons and the torque cams from Delta Camshaft and 185/80R13s and I can't get those tires moving when I'm burried to the undercarrage in sand! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorganM Posted August 25, 2005 Share Posted August 25, 2005 Yup, all that torque out of the engine is great, but if you can't get it through the clutch, what good is it? I've got the 9.5 pistons and the torque cams from Delta Camshaft and 185/80R13s and I can't get those tires moving when I'm burried to the undercarrage in sand! It gets transferd through the clutch fine. And when you are burred in the sand you are stuck; 300:1 crawl ratio wont even save you... just dig you deeper. Sand is tricky like that. I just ran the numbers through a crawl ratio equation. Even with 4.44 gears the crawl ratio is 23.37:1; currently my crawl ratio is 20.53:1. This wont be like putting on a real t-case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweet82 Posted August 25, 2005 Share Posted August 25, 2005 I just ran the numbers through a crawl ratio equation. Even with 4.44 gears the crawl ratio is 23.37:1; currently my crawl ratio is 20.53:1. This wont be like putting on a real t-case. A gain of less than 3? T-case time. P.S. A buddy offered me his basic sammi T-case for $75 deal? or not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoahDL88 Posted August 25, 2005 Share Posted August 25, 2005 Yup, all that torque out of the engine is great, but if you can't get it through the clutch, what good is it? Thats where you upgrade to the XT-6 clutch, or even the legacy clutch, but if you go legacy its reccomended that you machine the flywheel, or else it may not catch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott in Bellingham Posted August 25, 2005 Author Share Posted August 25, 2005 A buddy offered me his basic sammi T-case for $75 deal? or not? if you need it yes / get all the drive lines while your at it / I dont know the years but I know some years are more desirable then others Scott Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MorganM Posted August 26, 2005 Share Posted August 26, 2005 A gain of less than 3? T-case time. P.S. A buddy offered me his basic sammi T-case for $75 deal? or not? Running a second t.case is the only way you are gonna get real gearing in these bugger'rus. However it's more than just a t.case that's needed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
archemitis Posted August 26, 2005 Share Posted August 26, 2005 i ran a big ea81 clutch on my er27, with 28s and it was great offroad. the xt6 clutch is a bit better tho, but not nessecary. t-case is the way to go... that or buy a toyota. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numbchux Posted August 29, 2005 Share Posted August 29, 2005 I torched my clutch last week offroading with a wrangler...I need lower gears too! If you find a way to do this, and I can afford it, I'm in... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoahDL88 Posted August 29, 2005 Share Posted August 29, 2005 If you got 2k to spend, on top of your T-case mod, use these http://www.killeraxles.com/html/used_unimog_axles.html Mucho gearing, mucho strenth, and an extra 3 inches on what ever you have for a lift, might try Pinzgauer Axles, lighter weight, and still way to robust and strong to break with an EA-J anything Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
subynut Posted August 29, 2005 Share Posted August 29, 2005 Oooooo....... If you got 2k to spend, on top of your T-case mod, use these http://www.killeraxles.com/html/used_unimog_axles.html Mucho gearing, mucho strenth, and an extra 3 inches on what ever you have for a lift, might try Pinzgauer Axles, lighter weight, and still way to robust and strong to break with an EA-J anything Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numbchux Posted August 29, 2005 Share Posted August 29, 2005 If you got 2k to spend, on top of your T-case mod, use these http://www.killeraxles.com/html/used_unimog_axles.html Mucho gearing, mucho strenth, and an extra 3 inches on what ever you have for a lift, might try Pinzgauer Axles, lighter weight, and still way to robust and strong to break with an EA-J anything unimog's are incredible, and much of that is because of the planetary reduction gears at the hubs, wouldn't that be awesome?! however, I really like the fact that my entire drivetrain is tucked mostly up in the unibody, t-casing is way down the line for me. but I'd still like better gearing. The Jeep guys would laugh at a regular ol' stock wrangler, and he's still got a much nicer crawl ration than I I'll be in the market for a rebuilt/reworked tranny before too long (my synchros are not good) and was considering getting a front LSD from mudrat, but if someone finds a way to drop the gearing, I'd much prefer that! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vanislru Posted August 30, 2005 Share Posted August 30, 2005 Maybe an old set of VW planetary hubs could be retroed'? Pre 67 buses I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweet82 Posted August 30, 2005 Share Posted August 30, 2005 If you got 2k to spend, on top of your T-case mod, use these http://www.killeraxles.com/html/used_unimog_axles.html Mucho gearing, mucho strenth, and an extra 3 inches on what ever you have for a lift, might try Pinzgauer Axles, lighter weight, and still way to robust and strong to break with an EA-J anything No one is using the Unimog axles these days, the prices are dropping. Everyone seems to be doing the Dana 60 routine, it's cheaper and easier to find parts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stinky Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 What about replacing the gear for first gear with something that will lower it? Although there's not that much room to increase it's size it would seem like the easiest way to approach it. It might make for some interesting driving on the road ( going from a really slow first to second ) but for a mostly offroad rig it would be worth it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott in Bellingham Posted February 26, 2006 Author Share Posted February 26, 2006 What about replacing the gear for first gear with something that will lower it? Although there's not that much room to increase it's size it would seem like the easiest way to approach it. It might make for some interesting driving on the road ( going from a really slow first to second ) but for a mostly offroad rig it would be worth it. that would be great if theres a way to do that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JordanR693 Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 I hear all this nissan t-case mumbo jumbo about puting it on subarus. Where does the t-case come from and what i mean by that is off of what and what does it take to do the converstion i might be interested in that. Would it even work on a newer gen 94 imp? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numbchux Posted February 26, 2006 Share Posted February 26, 2006 I hear all this nissan t-case mumbo jumbo about puting it on subarus. Where does the t-case come from and what i mean by that is off of what and what does it take to do the converstion i might be interested in that. Would it even work on a newer gen 94 imp? you add a traditional transfer case behind the stock tranny. much like it would work in a truck or jeep. this requires quite a bit of modification, as the tcase needs somewhere to mount, which means you have to essentially build an entire frame under it. Also, you have to lift the car enough that you can put a second diff under the tranny. which means at least 8" this 'could' be done on an imp, but I'm sure it would be very difficult. it's been done repeatedly on EA81's, but only 2 or 3 times on EA82. even the extra complexity of an EA82 makes it much more difficult. so I'm sure it would be very hard on an imp. not to mention that the stock tranny would have to be modified to send all of the power out the rear output. Mudrat did this when using an EJ AT in his EA81 hatch, but it required pretty extensive modification. or, swap in an EA D/R tranny, which would give you the second lo-range reduction, but also open a whole new can of worms as far as modification goes. I'm not saying it's not possible, but it'd be pretty darn tough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stinky Posted February 27, 2006 Share Posted February 27, 2006 that would be great if theres a way to do that I'm sure it's doable, probably not much room for a bigger gear though. I'm trying to look into my options through some gearbox places nearby. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numbchux Posted February 27, 2006 Share Posted February 27, 2006 I would LOVE to have a lower 1st gear for every day driving! I was going to make a seperate lever this summer for the lo range reduction, so I could get 2WD lo without removing an axle, but if 1st was just a bunch lower, it wouldn't be an issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
genesis1 Posted March 22, 2006 Share Posted March 22, 2006 my only question is the fact of how and why you would use 31" tires on a EA82???? that is completly beyond me but it does sound like fun once you start actually putting it to use..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott in Bellingham Posted March 22, 2006 Author Share Posted March 22, 2006 my only question is the fact of how and why you would use 31" tires on a EA82???? that is completly beyond me but it does sound like fun once you start actually putting it to use..... clearance, traction and tire avalibility for off road Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stinky Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 Does the VW gearbox use CVs or does it have a tailshaft? If a tailshaft, then a VW gearbox might be a better option to run a divorced transfer case as they're pretty tough. Although being mounted at the rear the gears would probably be the wrong way around ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phizinza Posted March 25, 2006 Share Posted March 25, 2006 Bug's are rear engine RWD's... so I'd asume that they would use CV's and axles (drive shafts) Never really looked at one though, so I'm not sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stinky Posted March 26, 2006 Share Posted March 26, 2006 Yeah I think you're right about them being driven by CVs. Here's another option, I've heard of RX7 engines being mated to subaru gearboxes in a subaru ... you could in theory do the opposite then? use the rx7 gearbox attached to a subaru engine with the tailshaft going to a divorced transfer case? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numbchux Posted March 26, 2006 Share Posted March 26, 2006 Yeah I think you're right about them being driven by CVs. Here's another option, I've heard of RX7 engines being mated to subaru gearboxes in a subaru ... you could in theory do the opposite then? use the rx7 gearbox attached to a subaru engine with the tailshaft going to a divorced transfer case? why? just use the stock box in 4WD, then you have 2 lo ranges..... I'm thinking a transverse FWD car, with 2 of the long-side CV axles.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now