1 Lucky Texan Posted October 31, 2003 Share Posted October 31, 2003 Please prove that this IS the ULTIMATE board by answering any or all of these you can; 1. Most or all Subarus got r134a refrigerant in MY '94 2. Either as an option or standard, most Impreza models could have a 2.2l engine in MYs '95 - '01 3. Subarus got OBD2 in MY '95 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avk Posted October 31, 2003 Share Posted October 31, 2003 Originally posted by 1 Lucky Texan Please prove that this IS the ULTIMATE board by answering any or all of these you can; 1. Most or all Subarus got r134a refrigerant in MY '94 2. Either as an option or standard, most Impreza models could have a 2.2l engine in MYs '95 - '01 3. Subarus got OBD2 in MY '95 1: I believe all except '94 Loyale and Justy. 2: Option in '95, standard except MT Brighton in '96-'97, no 1.8l for '98. 3: 2.2l+AT is the drivetrain configuration that had OBDII in '95. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1 Lucky Texan Posted October 31, 2003 Author Share Posted October 31, 2003 THANK YOU!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jsavrtka Posted October 31, 2003 Share Posted October 31, 2003 My 95 Legacy L wagon with 5-speed MT also has OBDII. I can't see why they'd only put it in AT models when the ECU controls the engine, not the tranny. jim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
avk Posted October 31, 2003 Share Posted October 31, 2003 It might be different with Canadian vehicles, especially if they (or your particular car) were manufactured later in the production run. I know some '95 Imprezas actually corresponded to '96 lineup. At the very least, one can say that among '95 North American 2.2 MT models, there certainly were those w/o OBDII. Also, there were some differences in engine control systems between AT and MT. For example, AT models had EGR system and manifold pressure sensor. And ECU does communicate with TCU. One can imagine that in general, an accurate emission control, which is the purpose of OBDII, is easier to implement with AT and perhaps that's why the system was phased in beginning with those models. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now