aartod Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 I'm sure this has been addressed many times but I'll ask it anyways... At what year was the 2.5L engine head gasket problem corrected? (I am assuming it was corrected!) -- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uniberp Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 I'm sure this has been addressed many times but I'll ask it anyways... At what year was the 2.5L engine head gasket problem corrected? (I am assuming it was corrected!) -- Many threads. In general: ~1997-1999 DOHC - Internal HG leak. Requires new HG. 1999-~2002 SOHC- External HG leak. Requires additive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
idosubaru Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 basically have to get a 2003 or newer to avoid potential headgasket issues. or a better option is to buy one with a blown headgasket, cheap and easy to find, and install a brand new CCR engine with a 36,000 mile warranty on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
porcupine73 Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 The 2.5L dohc's 'phase I' had the potential internal HG exhaust blowing into coolant. These were used up to and including 1999MY, except maybe Forester got the phase II sohc in 1999MY; not sure The 2.5L sohc 'phase II' have the potential external peeping leak until up ~2003. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jon38iowa Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 t. These were used up to and including 1999MY, except maybe Forester got the phase II sohc in 1999MY; not sure /QUOTE] Indeed there was a mid year change for Forester; My '99 has the sohc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
idosubaru Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 just to clarify for the original poster - as to what year the headgasket problem was alleviated - 2003 is the answer, no matter all the technicalities between 1996-2002. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
porcupine73 Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 hehe good point; it's the old 'I asked you for a ride, you told me how to build a spaceship'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aartod Posted October 22, 2007 Author Share Posted October 22, 2007 Thanks for the info... I'll think I'll stick to 2.2's for now! 2003 is a little too new for me... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnceggleston Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 Thanks for the info... I'll think I'll stick to 2.2's for now! 2003 is a little too new for me... if '03 is too new , and you like 2.2L engines, you should keep in mind the 90 - 96 2.2L engines were non-interferrence. 97 - until, are all interferrence engines, t-belt, water pump, idler, or tensioner failure equals head / valve damage. so add the cost of a t-belt replacement to any '97 - until' car unless you know for sure when the belt was done. if you don't know when it was done you should do it sooner rather than later. waiting could be expensive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
idosubaru Posted October 23, 2007 Share Posted October 23, 2007 the 2.2 engine is available up until 2000 or so in some vehicles, i'd look for one of those, that's what i do for friends of mine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now