jonfit04 Posted May 19, 2008 Share Posted May 19, 2008 Hello Everyone, It's been about 7 months since I wrecked my Subaru and I am finally in the position to look for another one. I have been looking at two options, I found a 2002 Outback Limited with a little over 100k for $8995. I like the styling, but know that the head gaskets usually create a problem. With that in mind, I looked a 2002 Volvo v70xc Cross Country with 96k for $8995. It is super nice and the interior build quaility is high. So being torn, I am looking for your input. Any recommendations? Also, if anyone has a carfax account, it would be a super help if you could run the VIN's Volvo - YV1SZ58DX11011130 Subaru - 4S3BH686327601927 Thanks guys! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oregon_Legacy Posted May 19, 2008 Share Posted May 19, 2008 I had a 2000 Outback Limited and I never had a problem with it. The cars that you are interested in are both nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EVOthis Posted May 19, 2008 Share Posted May 19, 2008 take a look at this..... i believe there is a volvo or 2 in there..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mtsmiths Posted May 19, 2008 Share Posted May 19, 2008 take a look at this..... i believe there is a volvo or 2 in there..... We had a 2000 Legacy (that I 'Outbacked'), and we never had a HG problem. THe car was killed by a Grand Cherokee at about 180,000 miles. We replaced it with a new Subaru (well, a 24,000 mile 2006 Outback, bought from my next-door-neighbor who bought it new ... so since I've known the car since it came from the sealer ...) Personally I wouldn't buy the Volvo, if it ever needs dealer work you'll have to take out a home loan. For as long as we need winter cars we'll drive only Subarus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
howards11 Posted May 19, 2008 Share Posted May 19, 2008 I'd stick with the Subie. Parts are cheaper compared with the Volvo. Don't get me wrong Volvos are nice but in the long run you would be happier with a Subaru. ~Howard :cool: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oregon_Legacy Posted May 19, 2008 Share Posted May 19, 2008 I would personally go with the Subie... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davebugs Posted May 19, 2008 Share Posted May 19, 2008 I've bought and sold both. Yes Volvo seems to have used the same enines forever similar to Subaru. However very expensive and hard to obtain parts. Don't forget Volvo has been sold a few times in the last 10 years IIR. Ford bought them and recently sold them. Sounds like the future parts challange may be worse. You Don't want to replace a Volvo turbo either. I've had troubles reading the Volvo CEL's as well. Price some parts and labor on the Volvo and investigate the limited places that can do a good job of working on a Volvo. The Volvo places charge plenty but often seem lacking in actual ability. I'd stick with the Subaru. Dave Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nipper Posted May 19, 2008 Share Posted May 19, 2008 Both long lasting cars, but subaru will be much cheaper in the long run as far as parts and labor. nipper Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now